Weber State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
65  Hailey Whetten SR 19:52
100  Ellie Child SR 20:02
541  Paige Dilmore JR 21:00
603  Candace Sharp SO 21:05
745  Alice Neville JR 21:15
945  Maddie Ball FR 21:29
1,135  Isabella Williams FR 21:41
1,329  Michayla Miller FR 21:52
1,468  MarLee Mitchell SO 22:00
National Rank #49 of 344
Mountain Region Rank #7 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.0%
Top 10 in Regional 87.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Hailey Whetten Ellie Child Paige Dilmore Candace Sharp Alice Neville Maddie Ball Isabella Williams Michayla Miller MarLee Mitchell
MSU Invite 09/17 767 20:04 20:09 20:29 21:35 21:09 21:23 21:39 21:39 21:53
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 900 19:50 20:32 21:02 21:16 21:23 21:56 21:39
Steve Reeder Memorial Invitational 10/07 36:28
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational 10/14 847 19:43 20:14 21:22 21:20 21:06 21:35 22:03
Big Sky Conference 10/28 790 20:06 19:49 21:08 20:52 21:04 21:37 21:30 22:17
Mountain Region Championships 11/11 673 19:46 19:38 21:03 20:40 20:49 21:34 22:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 30.0 657 0.1
Region Championship 100% 8.5 237 0.1 0.4 1.5 7.3 21.5 22.8 19.9 14.6 8.8 2.5 0.8 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hailey Whetten 69.9% 61.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6
Ellie Child 41.6% 81.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
Paige Dilmore 0.0% 236.5
Candace Sharp 0.0% 212.5
Alice Neville 0.0% 225.5
Maddie Ball 0.0% 234.5
Isabella Williams 0.0% 243.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hailey Whetten 12.1 0.3 0.9 1.3 2.2 3.4 4.5 4.9 6.4 6.4 6.6 6.8 6.2 6.0 4.8 5.7 4.3 3.9 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.2 1.8 1.2
Ellie Child 17.6 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.5 3.0 3.8 4.4 5.1 4.7 4.4 5.3 5.1 4.3 4.2 3.7 4.7 3.8 3.2 3.7 2.9 3.3
Paige Dilmore 61.8 0.1
Candace Sharp 66.8
Alice Neville 75.3
Maddie Ball 88.1
Isabella Williams 98.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 0.1 3
4 0.4% 12.5% 0.1 0.4 0.1 4
5 1.5% 1.5 5
6 7.3% 7.3 6
7 21.5% 21.5 7
8 22.8% 22.8 8
9 19.9% 19.9 9
10 14.6% 14.6 10
11 8.8% 8.8 11
12 2.5% 2.5 12
13 0.8% 0.8 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.1% 0.1 100.0 0.0 0.1




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Vanderbilt 6.1% 2.0 0.1
Tulsa 3.4% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Florida State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0